Lea Haro. THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION of sparked strikes and protests all over Central Europe. In Germany the workers took an active interest in the Russian situation and demanded the presence of the SPD’s (Social Democratic Party) inspiring speaker, Rosa Luxemburg. For Luxemburg, the upsurge in strikes symbolized the revolutionary spirit of the working www.doorway.ruted Reading Time: 10 mins. · Rosa Luxemburg: The Mass Strike (Chap.2) II. The Mass Strike, A Historical and Not an Artificial Product. The first revision of the question of the mass strike which results from the experience of Russia relates to the general conception of the problem. Till the present time the zealous advocates of an “attempt with the mass strike” in Germany of the stamp of Bernstein, Eisner, etc., and also the . · Rosa Luxemburg: The Mass Strike (Chap.6) VI. Co-operation of Organised and Unorganised Workers Necessary for Victory. In connection with this, the question of organisation in relation to the problem of the mass strike in Germany assumes an essentially different aspect. The attitude of many trade-union leaders to this question is generally summed up in the assertion: “We are .
Be the first to ask a question about The Mass Strike - Rosa Luxemburg Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list» Community Reviews. Showing it was amazing Average rating · Rating details · 1 rating · 0 reviews More filters. Quote: Alongside Bordiga, Rosa Luxemburg () was another of the 'left wing communists' criticised in Lenin's polemic.[4] Unlike Bordiga, Luxemburg had strong libertarian tendencies, stressing that "freedom is always the freedom of dissenters", and her pamphlet 'The Mass Strike' remains highly influential amongst Marxists who have rejected Leninism, as well as many. Rosa Luxemburg made clear that discussions about a general strike must begin by making some basic distinctions between the industrial mass strike and the political mass strike, and in the latter, between the anarchist conception of the political mass strike and the social-democratic conception of the political mass strike.
The mass strike is merely the form of the revolutionary struggle and every disarrangement of the relations of the contending powers, in party development and in class division, in the position of counter-revolution – all this immediately influences the action of the strike in a thousand invisible and scarcely controllable ways. Chapter Three, The Development of the Mass Strike Movement in Russia, is the real heart of the pamphlet. In it Luxemburg describes the process of revolution through the year , the centrality of mass strikes, and how they had their genesis in the struggles of the decade before. It is by far the best place to start for any new reader. The third chapter ‘Development of the Mass Strike Movement in Russia’ is arguably the most important chapter as Luxemburg details the growth of industrial action taken against the Russian Empire. Workers who had never striked before began standing against their oppressive employers striking for an improvement of wages, schooling, working conditions, dignity in work.
0コメント